The confusing, disoriented, altering, flawed, seemingly useless, yet strangely and importantly important role of religion.

One of the most controversial parts of the human civilization, religion has dug it’s roots into the soil of the Earth. The phrase “Either you love it or hate it” could not be more true to religion.

We live in a world where religion has become either the cause or solution to our problems, penetrating our lives in every way possible. We are all affected by religion in some way or another. Either we go to church every Sunday, fall to our knees or bow our heads to a Godly statue. Some live under religious authority, while others have friends who politely say no when the pork chops come their way, and then there are those with the purity rings.

It is not surprising, however, that religion has got a flawed image. It seems that religion has, to many, become a pure, unprocessed core of evil and violence, preaching hatred and racism. Religion to many is a teacher of fear, disillusionment and fiction, giving humans a reason to never explain their actions.

And this is not recent.

Opposers of religion point towards the past where religion has been responsible for blood being spilled. From the Crusaders to 9/11 and beyond, it is no mystery that religion has become the bully of the class.

And like any bully, the class tries to either throw it out or silence it.

The tragedy of religion is that the entire meaning of it has been lost, not because of flaws in it’s ideology, but because of those who preach it.

Humans are the sole criminals when it comes to the question of religion.  

Religion is dangerous. Yes, there, I said it. It is dangerous simply because it can be manipulated and abused for personal benefit, and personal brain wash. But it is not dangerous in itself, it is dangerous because it is read, interpreted, practiced and followed by the ever so complex creation- The Human. Humans will do anything to prove their belief, because it lies within the human nature to be power-hungry and ego-boosting. And in this process, the people of religion will forget everything their religion stands for, and to prove themselves correct, they will pick out parts of their religion, tear it out of context and then wrongfully use it to support their clearly out of line thoughts.

Let me give you an example.

You are a parent, and you have an important meeting to get to. You leave a note on the fridge, saying;

“You can eat candy,  after you have eaten your dinner”

Your child comes home, and sees the note. He is happy and eats the candy.

You come home, only to find the dinner you left for your child untouched and all of the candy gone. Angry, you confront your child and demand an explanation. The child says,;

“Well, you did tell me that I can eat candy”.

Only problem? The kid didn’t store the next half of the sentence. He read and stored what he thought was best.

That same problem can be applied to religion. People read the Holy Scriptures, but at the same time, don’t. They read what they want to read and base their preaching on the parts that appeal to them, without putting that specific verse in context with the whole message of the religion.

One example can be from the Quran. There is a verse that goes something in the line of, “Oh ye who believe! Befriend not my enemies”. Now, some Imams use this as a “proof” that Muslims are not allowed to befriend any who do not believe in God, Jews, Christians… basically all non- Muslims. And this is the part where the Muslim population go crazy, because hey! WE CANT MAKE FRIENDS WITH NON-MUSLIMS ANYMORE!

But what Muslims don’t read are the very next verses, where it’s stated that it only applies to those who throw you out of your homes and chase you out of the lands, and a Muslims should not be short on kindness, because God loves those who show kindness. 

As if I would befriend the guy who throws me out of my own house because of my religion.

But you see the point don’t you? The same can be applied to the concept of polygamy. Every man knows the polygamy verse and are quick to defend it. But no man, at least not many, know that it the next few verses and in additional writings, it  is advised that you do not marry more than one woman as God knows you can’t treat all equal, which is a law, a rule and a right.  A woman can get divorced simply on the basis of unequal love from a husband (then again, a woman in Islam should, in theory, be allowed to divorce a man if she states that her sexual needs are not being satisfied by her husband) Now, of course, one can argue “why allow something and then not-allow it in the same verse?”. That is a heated and deep discussion which might just pop up here on my blog someday…

The problem with religion is that the advocates of it rarely have a clue about what they are talking about. No seriously, no joke.

I’ve been interested in many anti-Islam books. Not necessarily because I particularly like being called an ignorant fool with no sense of right and wrong., but because it enables me to see the same issue from both sides. Often culture and tradition plays a role in religious people, and unfortunately for the observer, there seems no difference. You have girls not being allowed to go to school, honor killings, forced marriages all in the name of Islam when all of those things have strictly been forbidden and deemed as haram. Tragic, isn’t it?

The media is also guilty to much of an extant. A racist, fire-blazing priest is far, far more interesting (apparently) than a small town imam talking about women rights. This is due to the fundamental structure of journalism- As a journalist once wrote, “Dog bites man is not news, but man bites dog is”.

The news broadcasters make sure that we hear of all the gay-hating priests, terrorism loving imams and women oppressing religious governments. But rarely do you hear of religious advocates who speak the truth in the most beautiful manner. Not saying that there aren’t any, but saying that there are plenty, they are just shoved under the rug, which is why it makes matters more dull.

Another important thing to point out is that disillusion, which means to be a synonym of religion for many, usually comes after passionate. Disillusion comes when you fear that your right to be a religious person is being taken away from you, so you do everything in your power to prevent it. It seems that a lot of religious people have, with good reason, gone into a self defence mode. 

Parents tighten the family rules and  governments impose unnecessary laws in the fear that the “others” are trying to change their religion and their lifestyle. Taking the Islamic world as an example, no surprise that this is happening. The West seems to impose their values, their traditions, their laws and regulations upon the Islamic nations (while not wanting anything un-Western impose upon themselves), and thus, the entire Muslim population has put up shields to protect itself, doing things that are un-Islamic.

And this doesn’t stop here, terrorists use Islam and the “stand up for Islam” message in the Quran as an excuse to blow themselves up. But it is not only for Islam they do this, they do it for all the Muslim countries that have been torn apart by the hands of the West and the countries on the hit list. It is human nature to defend one self, and when you have religion as a back-up support it makes everything much easier.

The real tragedy is that while protecting itself, the Muslim world has forgotten that religion cannot and must not, as stated in the Quran, be enforced. It is important that while standing up and defending your religion, you should not break the laws of your religion.

What religion needs now, in what seems a world where religion is becoming useless, is to find and bring forth advocates whom bring out the essential message of religion.

There is a story of Muhammad (s.a.w) who had garbage thrown on him by the same woman,  while he passed underneath her window. He didn’t change his route, and everyday, when she saw him walking by, she would empty her garbage upon him. Then one day, Muhammad noticed that there was no garbage thrown on him. Days went by and he asked about the woman. Someone told him that she had fallen ill. Muhammed did something that I would never think of doing. He went to her. She got afraid of what he might do to her, but instead of laughing at her, he started to take care of her. He would make sure she was fed, made sure she was feeling alright and helped her around the house. She eventually converted (or as the story goes) but thats not the point. The point is where are such advocates?

Heck, I know, I would have gone to the woman and probably given her a whole lecture about how she deserved it. Seriously, and this story, to some which may or may not be true, is my inspiration and it is my ideal goal. That is the kind of person I want to be. Ok, maybe I’ll swear at the bitch who tries to throw shit at me, but to bring yourself above that level and prove that you are a decent and amazing human being. To love someone thought they might hate you, to be calm and to be a better human than those who store hate is the true essence of religion.

So where does religion stand today? Teacher or bully? Or both, or something entirely different?

That my friend, I will leave for you to decide.

Until next time,

Mamashaal (( desi diva ))

On the fourth day of hope my true love gave to me…a couple of missile strikes on my country..

I apologize for the late post, I have had no internet connection for a week which meant that

1) My email inbox had 67 unread emails (yes, I’m that popular)

2) In which over half of the emails were Facebook Notices and newsletters of websites I have subscribed to (The Daily Show, Michael Moore, Beyonce…)

“Why didn’t you go to the library?” you may be asking. Well, honest answer is that my library card has been blocked because I still havn’t paid all those fines for returning books past their deadline (hey, you try reading 4 books at the same time!) I am afraid that the moment I step into the library some CIA look-alike guy will take me away and force every single penny out of me.

And just an extra peice of information, I still don’t have any internet connection at home. I’m at my uncles place at the moment..

But enough of that. Lets get down to buisness.

When CNN announced that Barack Obama was the new president of the USA, Pakistan erupted with joy. At least Lahore did. Family relatives called and told how many people were partying in the streets. Now, I’m not sure if they ever saw a debate that Obama participated in, nor do they know his promises and goals. All they cared about was that Bush was gone, and Republicans were not to be in power.

Typical Pakistanis. Patience is is absent in us (we expect the country to be super over-night) and then we are natural celebrators. We celebrate everything. You got a new car? Great, now throw a party. Your broken bone has healed? Perfect, go buy traditional sweets and give them out.  And then we have that uncureable habit of celebrating a bit too early.

Day four of hope, and Obama gave the Pakistani people a warm welcome to a new “era” under his rule. A couple of missiles.

Only issue, he didn’t exactly give the missiles to us to protect. He simply threw it on our heads.

Pakistan has for a long, long time been under the microscope, and it has been quiet evident that people have been more than eager to cross its borders for military purposes. And time and time again, the Pakistani people as well as that circus show of a government have pointed out, that Pakistan isn’t Iraq, nor is it Afganistan. Military opertaions from other countries within the borders of Pakistan is disliked, unacceptable and intolerable. Strong words, I know, but truth rarely comes as a sweet apple pie.

The allegation is simply that Pakistan is harbouring terrorists. Probably, but to drop bombs on villages where innocent people die isn’t exactly the best tactic. Would USA tolerate external military operations in their country? Several politicans said, regarding to the Gaza/Israel conflict, “If Canada threw a bomb on us, we wouldn’t just sit and watch. We would act”.

So if USA can say that, you don’t need to ask Pakistanis.

The matter of fact is that “killing off” terrorists is never ever going to succeed, because the civilian loss, as well as the infrastructure damage will only give birth to new terrorists, and will provide the best motivation for the fanatical religious teachers that have planted their roots along the borders of Afganistan.

Bombs, guns, and this tactic that the USA is leading is more hurtful than beneficial. It’s a circle with no beginning and no apparent end. What we need is not bombs, but what we need is the ink of the pen.

I am not going to say that we will ever stop terrorism, because there has always been terrorism. The definition and the face of terrorism changes from time to time, and to get rid of it would only be successful if we get rid of mankind all together. The term I will use on the other hand is “reduce”. In order to reduce terrorism it is vital that we first of all get affective leaders in charge.

Take Pakistan for an example.

A Pakistani president would have to, first of all, ensure the Pakistani people that he is Pakistan’s president and will act for the absolute benefit for the country. Sounds obvious and easy, but for a population that has been ruled by sold-out leaders and puppet dictators for the past 60 years, it’s a big challange. The president then would have to stabalize the economy. How on Earth do you do that with a global economy meltdown? Once I’ve figured that out, fully I’ll let you know. But one thing is for sure, Pakistan would take use of it’s global football making industry. And China would come in the picture, but no rush yet. I promise I’ll let you know.

But stabalizing the economy is just a small, but important, step. Many studies have shown that there is a direct correlation between poverty and crime. With the economy somewhat stable, the government would be able to get education running again. But a streetchild and his entire family relying on his earnings as a begger or child worker is not not even going to consider school, which is why a strong social system is needed. It is vital that people get the chance to even consider school. This means that the poor families need to be presented an alternative. It can be the idea of paying a child to go to school and get good grades that can work (as seen in the Zindagi Trust foundation). A street child goes to school and get good grades, his family gets cash. Cool idea, and a good start, but it isn’t enough to run the country. There needs to be more support from the wealthy part of the country, and a contract bond between the child’s family and the government that ensures that the child goes to school until the age of 18, which means that the child atleast completes highschool. In that way, the family gets money, and the child gets an education.

But where will the money come from?

Taaaaaxxxeeeessssss!

Tax is the only way the government to make money, and you would have to teach people that. Not by dragging the voting population into a seminar school, but when going out to hold rallies, and debates, you bring the subject and purpose of taxes in. Tell them, do they want their roads built?  Then tell them what role taxes play. Ofcourse, you can’t do that if you got an economical crisis. But you see where I’m heading?

One of the mistakes that political leaders in Pakistan have made is that they have focused on developed areas only. Take Lahore, my “hood”. It’s considered the soul of Pakistan, and is considered one of the most developed places in Pakistan. So why pour more money there? Lahore will develop more eventually, but it’s not like you hear terrorists have their bases in Lahore. It always seems to be in the Sindh province and Balochistan. That’s because the infrastructure, the education is very poor and the government seems to have no control over the areas. The only way to win the people over is to offer them a better alternative. Who will say no to electricity? Who will say no to schools, and water, and hospitals? The landlords whom act like presidents will have no control over the people in such areas, beacuse what they offer would not be able to match what the government offers. But this cannot be done by demaing and biting at those who live in such provinces. The key is co-operation and compromise. It is to extend a hand over to the people and tell them, “Believe it or not, we live in the same country, and guess what? We’re all Pakistanis”.

Another important thing is to be honest with the people of Pakistan. Tell them what the challanges are, tell them that one president cannot bring up an entire country. Tell them that they need to help carry the load and they need to be a part of the metamorphosis. If  USA threatens you, you tell the Pakistani people. There is no need to hide such things, because if anything goes wrong, you will be the one to blamed and not USA.  By this, you will also send out a clear message to countries that you are soley Pakistan’s president, and have the Pakistani people in mind when you make decisions.

I told you before, Pakistanis get hyped up pretty quickly. Any president that gives hope and change to the people of Pakistan will have their support.

As for terrorism in Pakistan, it will remain, because it is a poor country, and it is a country that pushed from all directions. But terrorism in Pakistan can and will reduced over time only if we get a capable president who is ready to face nothing but storms and play as the underdog. Pakistan will not be your dream country now, but maybe in the next 20, 30 years.  Illiteracy, poverty and anger is fuel for terrorism. Take those away and you are well on your way to establishing a nation where terrorism is an endangered art.

So, despite everything, I still have some hope for Obama, who, in my opinion,  glows of hope, change and better times,  and maybe he should reconsider his “fight-the-terrorists” tactic.

And who knows? Maybe Pakistan will get an Obama for itself someday.

Someday..

 Until next time,

Mamashaal (( desi diva ))

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.